Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: NetEqualizer Feedback
From: Vincent Stoffer <vince () REED EDU>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:59:23 -0800
Hello Esteban, We've had the NetEqualizer in place at Reed since the beginning of this year. So far, so good. It's lived up to the promise of being a set it and forget it type of appliance. It was replacing a Packetshaper and while we do miss the increased visibility into the traffic (including better monitoring and reporting) of the Packetshaper, the Netequalizer has been trouble-free at doing its job of equalizing traffic in a protocol-agnostic fashion. It requires very time little beyond the initial setup and bit of fine tuning. The unit will also allow us to continue upgrading our bandwidth without needing to upgrade the hardware (the reason our Packetshaper had to go). I'd be happy to discuss any further details with you, contact me off-list. Thank you, Vince * Reyes, Esteban <reyes () LAKEFOREST EDU> [100119 14:43]:
Someone has recommended me the Netequalizer for traffic shaping and I was wondering if anyone owned one or have had experiences using this product. Thanks, Esteban Reyes | Lake Forest College, IL
-- __ ___ _ __ ___ ___ \ \ / / | '_ \ / __/ _ \ Vincent Stoffer Network Security Administrator \ V /| | | | | (_| __/ Reed College Portland, Oregon \_/ |_|_| |_|\___\___| vince () reed edu 503-788-6695
Current thread:
- NetEqualizer Feedback Reyes, Esteban (Jan 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NetEqualizer Feedback Vincent Stoffer (Jan 19)
- Re: NetEqualizer Feedback Nathan Hay (Jan 20)