Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Server naming conventions
From: Sandra Barclay <ansed () UAA ALASKA EDU>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:33:06 -0900
In my department We name our machines and our servers after towns and villages in our state. Gets fun when we run out of known Alaskan places like Anchorage and Sitka and move on to some of the remote villages like Akiak, Chitina, Eek, and Kipnuk. Sandra Barclay IS Network Technician University of Alaska Anchorage Center for Human Development ansed () uaa alaska edu -----Original Message----- From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Steven Tardy Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 7:15 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Server naming conventions a wise man long ago decided to decouple the server purpose from the server name. physical servers get retasked confusing inventory and tracking and management. physical servers use tree names... fig / elm / oak / catalpa / pine / cedar / ... then DNS CNAMEs pointing the purpose to the host. smtps -=> catalpa our sister group used to use rocks/mineral. oak is easier to spell than tsavorite. (: other groups on campus use cartoon characters and movie characters. today with virtual servers, virtual servers are named based on purpose. ... a VM wouldn't be retasked. you'd simply create a new VM. distinct names makes things easier to remember: catalpa is part of smtps as opposed to: srv## is part of smtps can't remember what this server does? we have a file on each server with it's purpose. login and cat a file. Daniel Woodruff wrote:
What kinds of naming conventions do everyone follow when building new servers? Currently, our Windows hosts are named following the pattern
'its-w2ks#'
or similar, where the # is the next in the sequence, and the names are published in DNS. What are the potential drawbacks or using a scheme like this? Do you think it is any better or worse from a security perspective than using something like 'its-oracle-1' which has the service right in the name? We're concerned about disclosing the
purpose
of the machine via its name, and are trying to get an idea of what
other
schools do for their machines. Thanks in advance.
-- Steven Tardy Systems Programmer Information Technology Infrastructure Information Technology Services Mississippi State University sjt5 () its msstate edu
Current thread:
- Re: Server naming conventions, (continued)
- Re: Server naming conventions Gene Spafford (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Stucky, David (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Cal Frye (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Steven Tardy (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Stanclift, Michael (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Michael J. Wheeler (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Timothy Fairlie (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Derek Diget (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Michael J. Wheeler (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Julian Y. Koh (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Sandra Barclay (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Andreas Paulisch (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Dan Oachs (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Barbara Ann Torney (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Laurie Zirkle (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Chris Bennett (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions McCrary, Barbara (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Greg Schaffer (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Jeff Kell (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Hammond, Stanley (Feb 11)
- Re: Server naming conventions Barry Lynam (Feb 11)
(Thread continues...)