Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Ports and privileges
From: tqbf () secnet com
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 23:28:27 -0600 (CST)
... which (as far as I remember) breaks POSIX 1003 compatibility which states that chroot(2) shouldn't do a chdir(2).
Does POSIX say anything at all about what happens when you chroot() after already being chroot()'d? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas H. Ptacek Secure Networks, Inc. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.enteract.com/~tqbf "mmm... sacrilicious"
Current thread:
- Ports and privileges Chris Pugrud (Feb 20)
- Re: Ports and privileges James W. Abendschan (Feb 24)
- Re: Ports and privileges tqbf (Feb 25)
- Re: Ports and privileges James W. Abendschan (Feb 25)
- Re: Ports and privileges tqbf (Feb 25)
- Re: Ports and privileges Bernhard Schneck (Feb 27)
- Re: Ports and privileges tqbf (Feb 28)
- Re: Ports and privileges James W. Abendschan (Feb 27)
- Re: Ports and privileges tqbf (Feb 25)
- Re: Ports and privileges James W. Abendschan (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Ports and privileges tqbf (Feb 21)
- Re: Ports and privileges Darren Reed (Feb 21)
- Re: Ports and privileges tqbf (Feb 21)
- Re: Ports and privileges Vinci Chou (Feb 24)
- Re: Ports and privileges Bret McDanel (Feb 25)
- Re: Ports and privileges tqbf (Feb 27)
- Re: Ports and privileges Doug Hughes (Feb 27)
- Re: Ports and privileges Joseph S. D. Yao (Feb 27)
- Re: Ports and privileges Darren Reed (Feb 21)