Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: NAT on router vs. firewall
From: Bill_Royds () pch gc ca
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 13:30:17 -0400
How would you implement rules on firewall based on source address or destination address?. The firewall would only see the NAT versions of IP numbers so would not have any basis other than port to filter. We're in the process of doing some network reconfiguration and my boss suggested doing NAT on our router (a cisco) instead of on the firewall (running firewall-1). It sounded like a reasonable idea to me, but I figured I'd check here and see if there were any big issues with doing it on one as opposed to the other. Thanks gregory -- Gregory Blake HealthGate Data Corp Network Manager greg () healthgate com 781.321.6000
Current thread:
- NAT on router vs. firewall Gregory Blake (Jul 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NAT on router vs. firewall Bill_Royds (Jul 14)
- Re: NAT on router vs. firewall Neil Pike (Jul 14)
- Re: NAT on router vs. firewall Neil Pike (Jul 15)
- Re: NAT on router vs. firewall Bill_Royds (Jul 15)
- Re: NAT on router vs. firewall Neil Pike (Jul 17)
- Re: NAT on router vs. firewall Bill_Royds (Jul 19)