Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Speeds and feeds
From: tqbf () pobox com
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 22:10:16 -0500 (CDT)
Unless you are going to run iBGP between two separate routers, the second T-1 wouldn't be balanced. If you aren't running a protocol with your
Ah, I didn't catch the "two routers" bit. Yes, with two routers, you won't have balanced traffic --- unless you address the problem with a routing protocol. I would question why you would implement traffic balancing over two DS1s with two routers; a decent router that isn't doing naything but pushing packets is going to be one of the more reliable things on the network, and if you need fail-over, just keep a spare. Any decent router (a 3620, for example) can balance traffic over two DS1s. That would probably be the better solution (among all possible solutions) for an arbitrary company in an arbitrary location.
round-robin-like on a Cisco. Your inbound case may possibly be worse due to the asymmetric nature of routing like this - although this could still happen when you are running BGP also.
You'd need to have an agreement with your upstream to balance inbound traffic over the two lines; running an IGP between your end and the ISP should solve this. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas H. Ptacek The Company Formerly Known As Secure Networks, Inc. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.pobox.com/~tqbf "If you're so special, why aren't you dead?"
Current thread:
- Re: Speeds and feeds Stout, Bill (Jun 02)
- Re: Speeds and feeds David Lang (Jun 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Speeds and feeds tqbf (Jun 03)
- RE: Speeds and feeds Andrew J. Luca (Jun 05)
- Re: Speeds and feeds tqbf (Jun 05)
- RE: Speeds and feeds Andrew J. Luca (Jun 07)
- Re: Speeds and feeds tqbf (Jun 07)
- RE: Speeds and feeds Andrew J. Luca (Jun 07)
- Re: Speeds and feeds tqbf (Jun 07)
- RE: Speeds and feeds Andrew J. Luca (Jun 08)
- RE: Speeds and feeds Andrew J. Luca (Jun 05)