Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Trusted Unices Aren't?
From: ark () eltex ru
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 14:58:17 +0300
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- nuqneH, Hmm, that's just my opinion but VMS seems to be a system that requires *MUCH* less changes to become MLS than any general purpose Unix.. Jeremy Epstein <jepstein () tis com> said :
I've never heard that VMS was designed as MLS, and given the pain theywentthrough to get it evaluated, I doubt it was. Having said that, it certainly has fewer "gimme-all-privileges" applications (as you correctly note), for two reasons: it was correctly designed to have granularity of privileges and there are fewer applications altogether :-)Actually, there is a B1 VMS system: http://www.digital.com/security/sevms.htmFollowed by a short description of the features of SE/VMS. I certainly agree that there *is* a B1 VMS and that it's real B1 (i.e., it's been evaluated, and not just marketing hype). What I said was that VMS probably wasn't *designed* to be MLS. Just as there are several evaluated B1 (and even B2) UNIX systems doesn't mean that UNIX was *designed* to be MLS. --Jeremy ---------------------------------+------------------------------------- | Jeremy Epstein | E-mail: jepstein () tis com | | TIS Labs at Network Associates | Voice: +1 (703) 356-4938 | | Northern Virginia Office | Fax: +1 (703) 821-8426 | ---------------------------------+-------------------------------------
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ {::} {::} {::} CU in Hell _| o |_ | | _|| | / _||_| |_ |_ |_ (##) (##) (##) /Arkan#iD |_ o _||_| _||_| / _| | o |_||_||_| [||] [||] [||] Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBNjmp1qH/mIJW9LeBAQGVwgP+IT7ifVPwNBSqyV2a5PD/q+LWT0Sv1nP7 vT1nTxmL9MP8Wmuq90O7x7AmI1BFOf19vYO90UZ4/4RTJpUBdmfE86H5pWGBZ04w SzWnWUC/9dWPOyIh+Dgjf4Bp1dxWtZJVokmV10M6D9sFKRZ42BO+JAtwJKw1ewf8 4Iys1hM5xLk= =YkaS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? Paul D. Robertson (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? Gordon Greene (Nov 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? jcp01 (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? Paul D. Robertson (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? ark (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? Gordon Greene (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? ark (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? David Collier-Brown (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? Gordon Greene (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? David Collier-Brown (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? Gordon Greene (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? Gordon Greene (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? David Collier-Brown (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? Paul D. Robertson (Nov 02)
- Sidebar on a historical security model David Collier-Brown (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? Paul D. Robertson (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? ark (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? Gordon Greene (Nov 02)
- Re: Trusted Unices Aren't? Gordon Greene (Nov 02)