Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: VPN implementation
From: "Henderson, George" <George_Henderson () csx com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 17:11:56 -0500
We use AltaVista VPN as a VPN solution. It supports both NT and UNIX OS. The product itself works very well and provides good performance. Since it can reside on a UNIX plateform, it can be very secure. The UNIX version supports up to 2000 simultanous connections. The only drawback can be that it can sometimes be a pain to install on the client PC. On that note, the AltaVista VPN software can run on win 95, 98, and NT plateforms. I would recommend this software highly. Geo -----Original Message----- From: Crispin Cowan [mailto:crispin () cse ogi edu] Sent: Saturday, November 07, 1998 4:36 PM To: Dennis Nwaigbo Cc: firewall-wizards () nfr net Subject: Re: VPN implementation Dennis Nwaigbo wrote:
Hello gangs, I am building a VPN solution for our company. What I am trying to do is build a VPN through the internet so that my users can have a secure data access at the corporate headquarters through the corporate WAN. The environment is purely NT shop. The intent is to use native PPTP for connectivity. My questions are as follows: * I intend to use the native PPTP for connectivity. What are the
ups
and downs of this protocol for this solution? * What are the security ramifications for using PPTP instead of
IPSec? Bruce Schneier has an excellent analysis of the security of PPTP here: http://www.counterpane.com/pptp.html Basically, it's dreadful. From reading Schneier's analysis of PPTP, I would use something else. Crispin ----- Crispin Cowan, Research Assistant Professor of Computer Science, OGI NEW: Protect Your Linux Host with StackGuard'd Programs :FREE http://www.cse.ogi.edu/DISC/projects/immunix/StackGuard/ Support Justice: Boycott Windows 98
Current thread:
- VPN implementation Dennis Nwaigbo (Nov 07)
- Re: VPN implementation Crispin Cowan (Nov 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: VPN implementation Henderson, George (Nov 10)