Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance
From: Zzzil () aol com
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 21:29:14 EST
In a message dated 12/7/99 9:22:41 AM Pacific Standard Time, Ram () POP Jaring My writes:
I would like to get the wizards' take on what people are doing with
respect
> to staying connected and functional on the Internet during the rollover
to
> the year 2000. Do most organizations seem to be leaning towards reduced > exposure (i.e. shutting down incoming SMTP, restricting download
cpability,
> etc.), total blackout, or business as usual. If one is doubt of the Y2k compliance of their webservers, mailservers, routers, and firewalls, he/she should have done their homework by now. All machines should have been taken off-air and had their clocks changed to pre-Y2K, watch the rollover to check for any problems, reset the clocks to the real time, and put back all machines on-line. This, of cource, should have been done months ago. Firewalls are generaly new products, and wont have Y2k rollover problems. Most people run webservers that are fairly new too. Routers should have been checked long ago. If everything has been tested before to be Y2k-okay, then I see no reason
to
reduce exposure or shut things off.
It's not about firewalls, it's about interfacing with all those folks who did nothing to get ready. It's about who's going to be there trimming logs instead of drinking Champagne. My DH and I plan to be conveniently out of pager range, but who says pagers/cell phones/phones/traffic lights, are going to work anyway? You have to assess your situation in terms of what your exposure costs- If you can shut everything off, then hell, why not! If not, then add a backup person or two who can use a hefty holiday bonus. Bottom line, most off us HAVE to plan for everything to fall apart, and be ready. Extra personnel at this point in time is like the tiniest fraction of the whole readiness cost. As far as having tested everything in advance, it's a nice idea, but in real life, all the variables have changed. You have different data, different loads- an overall unpredictable environment. Good luck to everyone! I think it's exciting. Lizzz
Current thread:
- Y2K rollover Vigilance Brad MacQuarrie (Dec 06)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Saravana Ram (Dec 07)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Lance Spitzner (Dec 07)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Alejandro Rusell (Dec 07)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Saravana Ram (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Don Helms (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Daniel Monjar (Dec 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Zzzil (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Brad MacQuarrie (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Paul Grabow (Dec 30)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Saravana Ram (Dec 07)