Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Any reason not to use PIX ?
From: "Matthew J. Wolf" <mwolf () premtec com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 07:49:00 -0500 (EST)
One thing I have found wrong with the PIX is that it does not do nat on outside address. It only does nat on packets than have a out dest. All the other problems we've seen fix in the next release of software. Cisco has done a good job fixing the bugs. -Matthew J. Wolf -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Matthew J. Wolf | Premiere Technologies Network Engineer | Enhanced Calling Services Network Operations Infrastructure Team | 3399 Peachtree Road, NE Phone: (404)504-2359 Fax: (404)262-8516 | The Lenox Building, Suite 600 E-mail: mwolf () premtec com | Atlanta, Georgia 30326 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- "That's all there is, There isn't any more."-Madeline, by Ludwig Bemelmans
Current thread:
- Any reason not to use PIX ? Gledson Pompeu Correa Da Costa (Dec 07)
- Re: Any reason not to use PIX ? Bill Pennington (Dec 08)
- Re: Any reason not to use PIX ? Albert Hopkins (Dec 10)
- Re: Any reason not to use PIX ? Lorens Kockum (Dec 08)
- Re: Any reason not to use PIX ? Brad Van Orden (Dec 08)
- Re: Any reason not to use PIX ? S. Jonah Pressman (Dec 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Any reason not to use PIX ? ark (Dec 08)
- Re: Any reason not to use PIX ? Matthew J. Wolf (Dec 10)
- Re: Any reason not to use PIX ? Bill Pennington (Dec 08)