Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: new topic-professional hacking tecniques
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 07:11:27 -0800
In message <007901bf255e$5ecfe660$1753f4cc@reidfox>, "REID FOX" writes:
On a cable system where they are assigned a static IP and when their system will tend to be online more often however you may trace directly to their "parents" PC . Therefore it may be possible to resolve the problem directly without even bothering to notify ISP's who im sure have better things to do. Basically my statement says there are certain advantages to a static IP system over a dynamicly assighned IP system for non-spoofing hackers. So in some cases this may be easier than dealing with an ISP and his IP pool who has better things to do.
First, don't assume that all cable systems assign static IP addresses -- some don't. Some even use NAT, so that you can only reach someone more or less contemporaneously with the time they're annoying you. Besides -- what can you do to them that is legal and ethical? --Steve Bellovin
Current thread:
- new topic-professional hacking tecniques REID FOX (Nov 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: new topic-professional hacking tecniques Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 04)
- Re: new topic-professional hacking tecniques REID FOX (Nov 04)
- Re: new topic-professional hacking tecniques Matt Doughty (Nov 05)
- Re: new topic-professional hacking tecniques Steven Osman (Nov 08)
- Re: new topic-professional hacking tecniques dreamwvr (Nov 09)
- Re: new topic-professional hacking tecniques R. DuFresne (Nov 10)
- Re: new topic-professional hacking tecniques Johann G. Hautzinger (Nov 10)
- Re: new topic-professional hacking tecniques Matt Doughty (Nov 05)
- Re: new topic-professional hacking tecniques Saravana Ram (Nov 06)