Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: High Speed Firewalls
From: "David Newman" <dnewman () networktest com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 16:09:49 -0500
My contention is that it is not possible to ftp a 12.5-Mbyte(100-Mbit) filethrough a firewall with 100Base-T interfaces in 1 second, eventhough theinterfaces are theoretically capable of moving traffic at that rate.Ok. My contention is precisely that it IS possible to FTP a 100 Mbit file through a firewall with 100Base-T interfaces in one second, plus the epsilon time of network latency for the last packet to get through.
How does a firewall push: 100 Mbits of payload, plus packet headers, plus tcp setup, plus ftp setup, plus ftp teardown, plus tcp teardown, all across a 100-Mbit/s link in 1 second? Immunix must be even cooler than I thought. ;-) David Newman Network Test
Current thread:
- Re: High Speed Firewalls, (continued)
- Re: High Speed Firewalls Mike Barkett (Mar 07)
- Re: High Speed Firewalls Bennett Todd (Mar 07)
- Active FTP behind a router doing NAT Arnaud Chiaberge (Mar 12)
- Re: Active FTP behind a router doing NAT Ryan Russell (Mar 17)
- Re: High Speed Firewalls Eric Hall (Mar 13)
- Re: High Speed Firewalls Crispin Cowan (Mar 12)
- RE: High Speed Firewalls David Newman (Mar 12)
- Re: High Speed Firewalls Crispin Cowan (Mar 12)
- RE: High Speed Firewalls David Newman (Mar 12)
- Re: RE: High Speed Firewalls Crispin Cowan (Mar 17)
- RE: RE: High Speed Firewalls David Newman (Mar 17)
- Re: RE: High Speed Firewalls Crispin Cowan (Mar 21)
- RE: RE: High Speed Firewalls David Newman (Mar 21)
- Re: RE: High Speed Firewalls Crispin Cowan (Mar 21)
- RE: RE: High Speed Firewalls David Newman (Mar 21)
- Re: RE: High Speed Firewalls Crispin Cowan (Mar 21)
- RE: RE: High Speed Firewalls David Newman (Mar 21)
- Re: RE: High Speed Firewalls Saravana Ram (Mar 23)