Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: nmap fun
From: Bret Watson <lists () ticm com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 07:13:35 +0800
At 12:22 PM 26/10/00 -0700, you wrote:
This sounds impossible to perform with a Gauntlet 5.5 in standard configuration (which, BTW, for 5.5 under Solaris will initially configured to respond on X, rpc, as well as several RPC service ports). Matt LeGrow Network Associates, Inc.
That last comment sounds like we might have hit the nail.... we have noticed that it is surprisingly hard to convince Gauntlet to disable a proxy that we don't want anymore. Sure it stops permitting the traffic through but it still responds and runs..
NAI have promised us a visit from the asiapac FW guru... so I'll dig his brains on this one...
Cheers, Bret _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: nmap fun Chris Calabrese (Oct 27)
- Re: nmap fun Bret Watson (Oct 27)
- Re: nmap fun Magosányi Árpád (Oct 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- FW: nmap fun LeGrow, Matt (Oct 27)
- RE: nmap fun Frank Knobbe (Oct 27)
- RE: nmap fun LeGrow, Matt (Oct 27)
- RE: nmap fun Bret Watson (Oct 28)
- RE: FW: nmap fun LeGrow, Matt (Oct 28)
- Re: nmap fun Bret Watson (Oct 27)