Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: VPN Devices
From: acs <springer_0 () yahoo com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Yes, They are decent. Up until recently they were one of the best options. IPsec, L2TP etc. Easy to manage gui. Some theoretical redundancy, pretty scalable. Limited command line, costly, no unix clients. I would recommend that you look at netscreen. Command line, gui and enterprise management. They are fast and are good as packet filters with VPN. They also work in layer 2 mode. I have only used them as PFs though. If you need a VPN that can get out from behind NAT and firewalls look at infoexpress. You can get it out through proxies and NAT, it has solaris and linux clients. Server runs on a SUN machine. Clients are costly though. acs --- Randy Garbrick <randy.garbrick () gettyimages com> wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with Nortel Contivity VPN devices? I am looking for real life information on throughput, ease of use, security, reliability, redundancy and scalability. Randy Garbrick Senior Internetworking Engineer Getty Images
ATTACHMENT part 2 application/octet-stream
name=Randy Garbrick (E-mail).vcf __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://list.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- VPN Devices Randy Garbrick (Aug 28)
- Re: VPN Devices acs (Aug 31)