Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe?
From: Jeff Sedayao <sedayao () orpheus sc intel com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 08:41:07 -0800 (PST)
OK, here I go again breaking things :)
Over the years I've argued about blocking icmp at the border routers. Steve Bellovin et al would usually argue that it breaks path MTU, etc. I'd usually argue that we can rely on path MTU being negotiated elsewhere in the path (LAN vs. WAN bandwidth)...but I digress
Here's what I am suggesting:
1. We should all only do zone transfers (TCP) with known secondaries.
I think that is a good idea. Some people would argue that is all public information, but I prefer not to allow everyone to transfer..
2. Most if not all "normal" queries needed by legit Internet traffic are UDP.
Why not just block port 53 TCP connections at the border routers except for our secondaries. Is it possible to do a buffer overflow or other DNS/Bind exploit via UDP? I don't know the answer, I'm asking.
There are a couple of problems with this. 1. If you have responses to queries that are really big, DNS uses UDP for part of the answer and then switches to TCP. It seems like a bad idea to have records this big, but I have seen it happen. 2. Under certain lossy network conditions, DNS switches to using TCP for queries. Note sure if that would really help, but that is what happens. 3. You want to register domains in certain country domains, namely France (.fr) and the Netherlands (.nl). In order to register, these domains, the NIC's for those countries require TCP access on port 53 to your name servers. You can see for yourself with the .fr domain at http://www.nic.fr/zonecheck/ Alternatively, you could close TCP port 53 to your name servers as long as you made sure that DNS records are a reasonable size and opened the port in when you registered domains in Franche or the Netherlands.
Don
Don Kendrick, CNE, CCNA, GCIA, CISSP _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
-- Jeff Sedayao Intel Corporation sedayao () orpheus sc intel com _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? Don Kendrick (Mar 09)
- Re: Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? Gary Flynn (Mar 10)
- Re: Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? M. Dodge Mumford (Mar 10)
- Re: Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? David Lang (Mar 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? Don Kendrick (Mar 09)
- Re: Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? John Adams (Mar 10)
- Re: Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? Crist Clark (Mar 10)
- Re: Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? Jeff Sedayao (Mar 10)
- Re: Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? Andrew Huffer (Mar 10)
- Re: Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? Bill_Royds (Mar 10)
- RE: Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? Ben Nagy (Mar 11)
- Re: Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? Luca Berra (Mar 13)
- RE: Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? Todd (Mar 13)
- Re: Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? Darren Reed (Mar 14)
- Re: Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? Todd (Mar 14)
- Re: Does blocking TCP DNS packets keep your Bind safe? Darren Reed (Mar 14)