Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: dirty packet tricks?
From: Nate Campi <nate () campin net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:37:11 -0700
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:44:46AM -0600, Ryan Russell wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
That's really the meat of my question. I was thinking that I could suck 'em up promiscuously!! :)Of course, if you've got a real router, why not just have it route the traffic through the proxy, like every other firewall out there?
At work we have load balancers that take care of something similar for us. We take packets from certain hosts which are destined for a certain load balanced set of servers, and forward the packets to a load balanced set of cacheflow boxes. We do exactly what you're looking to do, but the proxy is a simple cache. -- "Smith & Wesson - the original point and click interface."
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- dirty packet tricks? Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 10)
- Re: dirty packet tricks? Stephen D. B. Wolthusen (Jul 10)
- Re: dirty packet tricks? Barney Wolff (Jul 10)
- Re: dirty packet tricks? Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 11)
- Re: dirty packet tricks? Ryan Russell (Jul 11)
- Re: dirty packet tricks? Stephen D. B. Wolthusen (Jul 11)
- Re: dirty packet tricks? Ryan Russell (Jul 11)
- Re: dirty packet tricks? Nate Campi (Jul 11)
- Re: dirty packet tricks? Charles Swiger (Jul 11)
- Re: dirty packet tricks? Frank Knobbe (Jul 12)
- Re: dirty packet tricks? Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 11)
- Re: dirty packet tricks? John McDermott (Jul 11)
- Re: dirty packet tricks? Ryan Russell (Jul 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: dirty packet tricks? Dana Nowell (Jul 12)