Re: tunnel vs open a hole

[Frederick M Avolio <fred () avolio com>]

> No one discussed the benefits of using an encrypted, authenticated
> tunnel (SSL, SSH, ...), which do provide additional controls. If I were
> developing/deploying a (presumably) distributed application *today*,
> I would begin with the assumption that I need stronger authentication
> than UIPW, message integrity, and message confidentiality. Many of
> the problems we struggle to correct today stem from the fact that
> we think of security as something orthogonal to application functionality
> rather than a core component/requirement.


Of course, encryption exacerbates the problem. :-) We can then gain a 
tremendously high level of assurance that Dave Piscitello did something 
over SSL to a particular IP address from a particular IP address. Which 
adds authentication and little else on top of the paragraph you cited:

> "The real question is whether the tunnelling system provides _ANY_
> security controls above and beyond ip/src/dest/logging."


Fred


_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards