Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

RE: pixen abnomalities;


From: "Melson, Paul" <PMelson () sequoianet com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 16:41:22 -0400

That's a new one on me.  You can use 'service resetoutside' and/or 'service resetinbound' to cause the PIX to send an 
RST back to hosts sending TCP packets that are denied by an access-list (or just denied in general).  I don't know if 
this would result in connections that exceed the idle time set with the 'timeout' command receiving an RST or not.  I'd 
be interested to know how it behaves if anyone has tried this.

PaulM


 -----Original Message-----
It's ben awhile since I played in a firewall admin role, and worked mostly
with fw-1 ipchains/iptable kinda setups.  But, in a new position as a
unix/web admin, I'm dealing with firewall admins that maintain that not
setting the pixies to send an rst upon idel timeout is a 'protection' in
case the connection that went idle was hijacked.  Course, this will hose
up a console connetion for a good twenty minutes or more depending upon
the configuration of the sytems I'm using a console on.  But, is this
really a concern and rationale for not sending an rst on idle timeout
limits?
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


Current thread: