Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Re: Putting MS servers behind firewalls

From: Tichomir Kotek <tichomir.kotek () lynx sk>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 09:32:32 +0200

Devdas Bhagat wrote:

On 08/06/04 08:23 -0400, Paul D. Robertson wrote:
<snip>

ISA server theoretically knows enough to proxy the connections- that's
your second-best bet.  Your best bet is to move everything serious behind


Perhaps a VPN might be a better solution?


VPN wrap around RPC (klient<->server) is actually worse than "plain" approach, it is possible to
go through tunnel with any protocol, hiden for NIDS, FW etc.

tk

--
Tichomír Kotek
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

Current thread:

Putting MS servers behind firewalls Dilan Walgampaya (Jun 07)
- Re: Putting MS servers behind firewalls Luca Berra (Jun 08)
- Re: Putting MS servers behind firewalls Paul D. Robertson (Jun 08)
  - Re: Putting MS servers behind firewalls Devdas Bhagat (Jun 08)
    - Re: Putting MS servers behind firewalls Tichomir Kotek (Jun 09)
- Re: Putting MS servers behind firewalls Dave Piscitello (Jun 08)
- RE: Putting MS servers behind firewalls Mark Gumennik (Jun 08)
  - RE: Putting MS servers behind firewalls Paul D. Robertson (Jun 08)
  - Re: Putting MS servers behind firewalls Dan Harp (Jun 08)
  - Message not available
    - Re: Putting MS servers behind firewalls Victor Williams (Jun 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Putting MS servers behind firewalls Michael H (Jun 07)
  - More infor - Re: Putting MS servers behind firewalls Dilan Walgampaya (Jun 08)
- Re: Putting MS servers behind firewalls firewalladmin (Jun 07)
- RE: Putting MS servers behind firewalls Melson, Paul (Jun 08)
- RE: Putting MS servers behind firewalls Kelly, Chris W. (Jun 08)

(Thread continues...)