Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Re: Locking down public wireless access


From: "Dale W. Carder" <dwcarder () doit wisc edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:22:36 -0600


On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Dale W. Carder wrote:
There's several free captive portal thingys out there like NoCatAuth, PacketFence, and then the vendors like Perfigo (now vendor C), BlueSocket, and BSi. We found that they all had limitations one way or another, so choose your poison carefully!

On Feb 23, 2005, at 11:21 PM, David Lang wrote:
Dale, any chance of getting you to list the limitations that you ran into to save the rest of us some research time? :-)

I define limitations as "things that did not meet our functional requirements", so I doubt that everything that was a limitation to us may be a limitation for you. You need to develop your design, the requirements needed to fit your design, then look at products that fit your requirements.

Some of our functional requirements included supporting things like vlans, separate mac address tables per vlan, snmpv2, ospfv2, pim-sm, and ipv6.

I was shocked that one vendor's device marketed as network gear, a bridge in particular, didn't support snmp at all, let alone rfc1493.

Dale

-----------------------------------------------
Dale W. Carder
Network Engineer
University of Wisconsin at Madison
http://net.doit.wisc.edu/~dwcarder

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


Current thread: