Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum
From: <lordchariot () earthlink net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:35:33 -0500
So why would Cyberguard, or any other product, be better configured? The same types of people, in the same organizations, would run it...
As a general observance, customers of CyberGuard, Secure Computing, or other higher-than-average security products use more due diligence in selecting products. That's why they selected the products in the first place. Many of them will get evaluation units and actually run their own VA scans to and through them to see how they hold up under load and malicious traffic instead of relying on the pretty pictures in the glossy brochure. I suspect that many (most?) mainstream product purchases are a result of an exec seeing an ad in WSJ or other brand recognition and succumb to marketspeak rather than making informed decisions through their own investigation. Don't get me wrong, I've seen some pretty bonehead configurations on these products too, especially when execs insist on stuff like raw native access from outlook to exchange because it's "too hard" to use a VPN client. But as a generalization, the admins of CG & SC are a pretty savvy lot. Smarter than your average bear, even.
or is Cyberguard only sold to admins that pass a cluefullness test?
No, but I try my best to sell them a clue by asking about their policy first and how they expect the firewall to enforce it. erik Disclaimer: Opinions are strictly my own. I represent the aforementioned products. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: RE: IDS (was: FW appliance comparison), (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: RE: IDS (was: FW appliance comparison) Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 27)
- Message not available
- Re: RE: IDS (was: FW appliance comparison) Brian Loe (Jan 26)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Devdas Bhagat (Jan 25)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Christine Kronberg (Jan 24)
- Message not available
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Avishai Wool (Jan 25)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul D. Robertson (Jan 25)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum ArkanoiD (Jan 25)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Avishai Wool (Jan 25)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum ArkanoiD (Jan 25)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Patrick M. Hausen (Jan 27)
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum lordchariot (Jan 27)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Anton Chuvakin (Jan 27)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul D. Robertson (Jan 20)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Greg Spath (Jan 20)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Patrick M. Hausen (Jan 18)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 18)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 18)
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul Melson (Jan 18)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Patrick M. Hausen (Jan 18)
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul Melson (Jan 19)
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Cat Okita (Jan 19)