Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum
From: david_harris () arnotts com
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:43:33 +1100
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, sai wrote:on firewall if you really want all-in-one boxes. Why would you want an IDS on the same machine as a firewall? Its not going to work. It will not have enough signatures to give you the sort of security you need.[What the heck, no interesting debate in a while...] I think there's a bigger question "why would you want an IDS?" AFAICT, IDS's are only good for (a) stopping stuff your firewall rules should already stop or (b) stopping known-bad stuff you have to let in that almost always have patches or work-arounds and (c) if you're regulated into them (i.e. HIPPA.)
I think it should be re-iterated that the D in IDS is 'Detection'. Alot of people are using this term very loosely of late. I agree that IDS is a waste of time except if you need to provide glossy feel good reports to mgmt. Then theyr'e great!
Since I tend to preach good firewall rulesets and strengthening the obvious vectors with good patching/strong configuration, I really fail to
see situations where "If only we'd had an IDS/IPS" is the matra rather than "if only we'd patched/filtered" wasn't an altogether better mantra. Maybe someone hitting the IDS pipe can come up with some good examples of
when just doing the right thing wouldn't have stopped whatever it is that
is known enough for signatures but not enough for configuring or patching... Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal
opinions
paul () compuwar net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." http://fora.compuwar.net Infosec discussion boards _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
********************************************************************** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential information and is intended solely for use by the individual to whom it is addressed. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender, do not disclose its contents to others and delete it from your system. ********************************************************************** _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Roy Duperret (Jan 17)
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul Melson (Jan 17)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum sai (Jan 18)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul D. Robertson (Jan 18)
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul Melson (Jan 18)
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul D. Robertson (Jan 18)
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul Melson (Jan 19)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum sai (Jan 18)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Devdas Bhagat (Jan 18)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul D. Robertson (Jan 18)
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul Melson (Jan 17)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum david_harris (Jan 20)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum sai (Jan 20)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul D. Robertson (Jan 20)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Devdas Bhagat (Jan 23)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul D. Robertson (Jan 23)
- RE: IDS (was: FW appliance comparison) Ben Nagy (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: IDS Chuck Swiger (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: IDS (was: FW appliance comparison) Patrick M. Hausen (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: IDS (was: FW appliance comparison) ArkanoiD (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: IDS (was: FW appliance comparison) Cat Okita (Jan 24)
- Re: RE: IDS (was: FW appliance comparison) Paul D. Robertson (Jan 24)