Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Enforcing content filtering with PIX515E
From: Victor Williams <vbwilliams () neb rr com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:41:02 -0600
The simplest way to get SurfControl to example all packets headed to and through your firewall is to put both your firewall and the surfcontrol server on the same hub. SurfControl will automatically see all traffic and make decisions on it accordingly. If you have a switched network, depending on your switching fabric, you should be able to set up port mirroring on the port SurfControl is running on, and set it to mirror the port that the PIX is plugged into. If you do have SurfControl licensed, you should have access by default to their knowledgebase where they cover this in at least 4 different articles. Redirecting traffic from port 80 won't work...because the traffic will get to the SurfControl server, but how in turn will the SurfControl server then tell the traffic to proceed to the internet where it's supposed to go, when that traffic is then going to be told to be sent right back to the SurfControl server (itself) again? You're going to get an infinite loop going there. Also, just to clarify, SurfControl isn't a content filter. It's a URL and port/protocol filter. It doesn't examine the full content/packets of anything. It looks at how, say, a URL is classified as, and chooses to allow or deny it based on your rules. It doesn't look at the content of anything but it's own database of URLs, and decides how to process your request. Ian Rarity wrote:
Hi all, Apologies if this is dumb, obvious or both, but I've never had to get a firewall to do this before. We've just signed up with SurfControl to provide us with content filtering for our web users. Actually getting all the various versions of various browsers on our network to use it as their proxy server is proving problematic; each version of IE seems to store the proxy URL in a different registry key. Also, thanks to our IT policy (or lack thereof), there's not much we can do to prevent users simply removing the proxy setting in their browsers and looking at whatever sites they please. So I thought I'd try reconfiguring our firewall to send any outgoing traffic on port 80 to the IP/port that SurfControl gave us. The access-list for the inside interface on the PIX currently reads: access-list acl_in permit icmp any any access-list acl_in permit ip any any In other words, anything on the inside interface is allowed to access anywhere. Am I right in thinking that to force outgoing port 80 traffic in the direction of SurfControl, I'd need to add a line to acl_in along these lines: access-list acl_in permit any host 80 <surfcontrol's IP> 8081 Would this suffice, or do I need something more involved? Thanks, Ian. ********************************* Ian Rarity Technical Engineer ESPC (UK) Ltd. ******************************************************************* Private and Confidential: This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for the addressee. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, disclose, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify our E-mail Systems Administrator on +44 (0) 131 624 8000. ESPC (UK) Ltd does not accept any liability for any harm that may be caused to the recipient's system or data by this message or any attachment. ESPC (UK) Ltd is a company registered under the Companies Acts in Scotland (Registered Number SC203535), and having its registered office at 90A George Street, Edinburgh, Midlothian EH2 3DF. ESPC (UK) Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Enforcing content filtering with PIX515E Ian Rarity (Jan 22)
- Re: Enforcing content filtering with PIX515E Josh (Jan 22)
- Re: Enforcing content filtering with PIX515E Victor Williams (Jan 22)
- Re: Enforcing content filtering with PIX515E Miedaner (Jan 23)
- Re: Enforcing content filtering with PIX515E Christopher J. Wargaski (Jan 22)
- Re: Enforcing content filtering with PIX515E Ian Rarity (Jan 28)
- Re: Enforcing content filtering with PIX515E Paul D. Robertson (Jan 22)