Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0
From: "Christopher J. Wargaski" <wargo1 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:54:35 -0600
Hey Brian-- Configuration-wise you should have no problems with 8.0 if you know 7.1. You appear to have NAT configured correctly. You ACLs look good too. what I do not see are any route statements--do you have a default route set? Also, you should increase the message-length maximum to 4096 given the rollout of DNSsec. cjw
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Brian Blater (Mar 11)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 John Morrison (Mar 15)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Christopher J. Wargaski (Mar 15)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Kevin Horvath (Mar 17)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Brian Blater (Mar 19)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Christopher J. Wargaski (Mar 22)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Brian Blater (Mar 22)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Christopher J. Wargaski (Mar 22)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Kevin Horvath (Mar 17)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 John Morrison (Mar 22)
- Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0 Brian Blater (Mar 22)