IDS mailing list archives
Re: Re: Changes in IDS Companies?
From: "Proxy Administrator" <proxyadmin () rediffmail com>
Date: 5 Nov 2002 08:32:51 -0000
Aiguo Fei wrote :
>so you wouldn't miss any attack that it *could* detect.This is NOT true. If the IDS system doesn't have enough processing >power or doesn't have a good enough performance, under certain load >it may fail to process(analyze) the packet to catch the attack (of >course it has to let it pass through to fullfill the inlining >requirement).
Hmmm... is this true for any other system out there which is placed inline? I thought this issue would be handled the same way a firewall would handle it.
Regards, Proxy Administrator
Current thread:
- RE: Changes in IDS Companies? Kohlenberg, Toby (Nov 02)
- RE: Changes in IDS Companies? Kevin Timm (Nov 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Changes in IDS Companies? Frank Knobbe (Nov 02)
- Re: Re: Changes in IDS Companies? Proxy Administrator (Nov 02)
- Re: Re: Changes in IDS Companies? Proxy Administrator (Nov 09)
- Re: Re: Changes in IDS Companies? Aaron Turner (Nov 11)
- Re: Changes in IDS Companies? Andrew Plato (Nov 11)
- RE: Changes in IDS Companies? Kohlenberg, Toby (Nov 13)
- IDS for DataBase Systems. Hemant Ramnani (Nov 13)
- Re: Changes in IDS Companies? Gary Golomb (Nov 13)
- Re: Changes in IDS Companies? Dominique Brezinski (Nov 13)