IDS mailing list archives
RE: IDS (ISS) and reverse engineering
From: "Teicher, Mark (Mark)" <teicher () avaya com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:00:10 -0700
Untrue, They have network security engineers that have been coding up protocol decodes longer than most opensource IDS signature products have been available /m -----Original Message----- From: V.O. [mailto:vosipov () tpg com au] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 1:54 PM To: focus-ids () securityfocus com Subject: Fw: IDS (ISS) and reverse engineering (re-submitted by the moderator's request - he asked not to cross-post) Recently I've got to listen to a marketing pitch by an ISS guy. He was going along the lines of "our X-force reverse-engineered Microsoft RPC libraries and created signatures..." and "we use protocol decoding, so we reverse-engineered various closed-source protocols in order to create out decoders". What struck me - isn't this kind of activity actually illegal in the US? To which extent it is possible to disassemble Windows code? And if it is illegal, then aren't their customers (plus many other IDSes, with the exclusion of Snort, probably) in danger - what if Microsoft or whoever else sues ISS for doing this? :) I'm puzzled. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Fw: IDS (ISS) and reverse engineering V.O. (Nov 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IDS (ISS) and reverse engineering Drew Copley (Nov 26)
- Re: IDS (ISS) and reverse engineering rsh (Nov 27)
- Re: Fw: IDS (ISS) and reverse engineering PAUL_TAYLOR (Nov 26)
- RE: IDS (ISS) and reverse engineering Teicher, Mark (Mark) (Nov 27)
- Re: Fw: IDS (ISS) and reverse engineering Andrew Plato (Nov 27)