IDS mailing list archives
Re: Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets
From: zubair.shafiq () yahoo com
Date: 13 Mar 2009 12:00:16 -0000
"You have a point here, on the other side this poses a huge challenge to the replicability of results, and therefore to scientific vetting of data before publication. So I am convinced that you need to validate your ideas against data coming from the wire, but on the other hand some means of comparison between different approaches must be established." I agree cent percent with Stefano, there has to be some validation and performance benchmarking mechanism. I personally believe that we badly need a community resource like CRAWDAD (http://crawdad.cs.dartmouth.edu/); a place = where we all should contribute at least what we have or agree to share. Someone has to take the initiative!!! Regards Zubair
Current thread:
- Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets, (continued)
- Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Seth Hall (Mar 16)
- Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Sam Gorton (Mar 13)
- Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets Raffael Marty (Mar 13)
- Exploit-based signature is dead, or not? tanyoo10 (Mar 16)
- Re: Exploit-based signature is dead, or not? Sergio 'shadown' Alvarez (Mar 16)
- Re: Exploit-based signature is dead, or not? Jackie Lai (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Exploit-based signature is dead, or not? tanyoo10 (Mar 17)
- RE: Exploit-based signature is dead, or not? Addepalli Srini-B22160 (Mar 17)
- Re: Exploit-based signature is dead, or not? Joel Esler (Mar 30)
- Re: Exploit-based signature is dead, or not? tanyoo10 (Mar 18)
- Re: Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets zubair . shafiq (Mar 13)