Full Disclosure mailing list archives

administrivia...duplicate messages


From: full-disclosure () lists netsys com (Bill Thompson)
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 05:17:28 -0700

If you think the S/N is bad here, your not reading BugTraq and VulnWatch.
There's more cross posting on the security lists now than alt.flame.

List Admins-
Please try to get to the bottom of these duplicate/cross posted messages
and feel free to post the discussion to the list. 

On Thu, 1 Aug 2002 19:23:11 -0500 (CDT)
Alif The Terrible <measl () mfn org> wrote:


Do you two think you could take this crap off list(s)?  The S/N ratio is
already bad enough..


On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Len Rose wrote:

Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 19:43:04 -0400
From: Len Rose <len () netsys com>
Reply-To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] administrivia...duplicate messages

Hi Elias, I did look at the headers, and they're showing SF mail
servers.

Len

On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 12:59:34PM -0600, aleph1 () securityfocus com
wrote:
* Len Rose (len () netsys com) [020801 12:36]:

SF is re-injecting articles into this list when
Cc'd on a posting.

Len,

Actually, if you cared to read the headers of the duplicate messages
you'd notice that they are being reinjects by some subscribers of
the list, not us.

-- 
Elias Levy
SecurityFocus
http://www.securityfocus.com/
Si vis pacem, para bellum

-- 
BillT () Mahagonny com - PGP KeyID#: 0xFB966670

"Crappy old OSes have value in the basically negative sense that 
changing to new ones makes us wish we'd never been born."
                                -Neal Stephenson 1999



Current thread: