Full Disclosure mailing list archives
OT: Snosoft vs HP
From: full-disclosure () lists netsys com (Dehner, Benjamin T.)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:41:00 -0500
Security through litigation: "Our product is secure, because we will sue you if you say otherwise." While HP may or may not be legally in the right -- I'll let the lawyers decide that -- I'm the one going to be up at 3AM rebuilding a server some blackhat crashed. And I don't get paid by the hour. I intend to have a talk with the IS director about our future acquisition and use of HP equipment. -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Pinski [mailto:pinskia () physics uc edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:53 PM To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] OT: Snosoft vs HP Actually HP was pissed at Theo for what OpenSSH did. It sounds like HP had to hire back the OSF/1 (oops mach opps Utitrix oops Tru64) people back to make patches for OpenSSH. Thanks, Andrew Pinski _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Full-Disclosure () lists netsys com http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
Current thread:
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Len Rose (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP ATD (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP John Scimone (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Len Rose (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP John Scimone (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Blue Boar (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP John Scimone (Jul 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Moyer, Shawn (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Andrew Pinski (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Tom Perrine (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Cushing, David (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Dehner, Benjamin T. (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Dave Killion (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Moyer, Shawn (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP ATD (Jul 31)