Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: (no subject) PS
From: "Schmehl, Paul L" <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:02:01 -0600
I have to hand it to you. Arguing that *withholding* information *increases* freedom and doing it with a straight face is certainly bold. :-) Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu) TCS Department Coordinator The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/
-----Original Message----- From: anakata [mailto:anakata () anakata hack se] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:53 AM To: Boris Lorenz Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] (no subject) PS The problem with this line of reasoning is that this paranoid response to the security risks isn't caused by the (few) blackhats. It's caused and sustained by the security industry - who obviously are the FUD-mongers - aided by the armies of script kiddies - who are responsible for almost all damage and intrusions - which their practice of full disclosure creates. Thus, ending this practice will _increase_ freedom.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: (no subject) PS Euan Briggs (Nov 23)
- Re: (no subject) PS Boris Lorenz (Nov 26)
- ranting.. was Re: (no subject) PS Silvio Cesare (Nov 26)
- Re: ranting.. was Re: (no subject) PS Ka (Nov 26)
- Re: ranting.. was Re: (no subject) PS Boris Lorenz (Nov 26)
- Re: (no subject) PS anakata (Nov 26)
- ranting.. was Re: (no subject) PS Silvio Cesare (Nov 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: (no subject) PS Schmehl, Paul L (Nov 26)
- RE: (no subject) PS Gregory Kornblum (Nov 26)
- Re: (no subject) PS Boris Lorenz (Nov 26)