Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: improper scan abuse
From: "S Menard" <smenard () nbnet nb ca>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 08:30:21 -0300
Thanks to Benjamin for quickly reminding me of the open mail relays points and adjusting my firewall rules to suit. Any further suggestions on known lists of But, It sounds like I hit a nerve. scanning for any reason SUCKS willie wonka candies some like em, some don't AND it brings up the whole defensive scanning / aggressive defense debate. I thought up a few scenarios where a user/admin can abuse this type of service can easily be abused So Shawn here's my PUBLIC APOLOGY for being an idiot who speaks his mind. Stephen Menard smenard () nbnet nb ca ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shawn McMahon" <smcmahon () eiv com> To: <full-disclosure () lists netsys com> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 10:24 PM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: improper scan abuse On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 07:06:29PM -0400, Stephen Menard said:
I do not accept those terms Or maybe everyone should make such claims!
So, are you gonna post the apology publicly too, like you did the accusation? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: improper scan abuse Stephen Menard (Apr 04)
- Re: Re: improper scan abuse Benjamin Krueger (Apr 04)
- Re: Re: improper scan abuse Shawn McMahon (Apr 05)
- Re: Re: improper scan abuse S Menard (Apr 06)