Full Disclosure mailing list archives
JAP back doored
From: error <error () lostinthenoise net>
Date: 21 Aug 2003 10:20:44 -0700
This is a terrible day for privacy advocates that used the once (perhaps never true) "anonymous" Java Anonymous Proxy. According to a story ( http://theregister.co.uk/content/55/32450.html) by The Register (It was also posted to ("http://securityfocus.com/archive/1/334382/2003-08-18/2003-08-24/0) BugTraq) JAP was back doored by court order. It was a forced upgrade (after a service interruption) to monitor "one site" that continues to be unnamed. How sad it is when a group have a motto of "Anonymity is not a crime." and then hand logs to the police without a word? Clearly if they are able to defend themselves on alt.2600 (http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&frame=right&th=f4ef43f695ca29e8&seekm=3f3d3740%241_1%40news.vic.com#link10), they aren't under a gag. Read it and weep. -- error <error () lostinthenoise net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- JAP back doored error (Aug 21)
- Re: JAP back doored Thor Larholm (Aug 21)
- RE: JAP back doored Drew Copley (Aug 21)
- Re: JAP back doored Florian Weimer (Aug 21)
- RE: JAP back doored Drew Copley (Aug 21)
- RE: JAP back doored gml (Aug 21)
- RE: JAP back doored Drew Copley (Aug 22)
- Re: JAP back doored Florian Weimer (Aug 22)
- RE: JAP back doored Drew Copley (Aug 22)
- Re: JAP back doored Florian Weimer (Aug 22)
- Re: JAP back doored felix . roennebeck (Aug 25)
- Re: JAP back doored Florian Weimer (Aug 21)