Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Reacting to a server compromise
From: "Brad Bemis" <Brad.Bemis () airborne com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 09:26:28 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In general, digital evidence and the methods used to collect it must stand up to tests of 'reasonableness" as determined by the presiding judge. Thank you for your time and attention, ======================== Brad Bemis ======================== Email Notice: This communication may contain sensitive information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication in error; do not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information contained herein for any purpose. Please alert the sender that you have received this message in error, and delete the copy that you received.
-----Original Message----- From: James A. Cox [mailto:computer () jacox net] Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 4:07 PM To: Jennifer Bradley Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Reacting to a server compromise I've never heard of a rule that prohibits the introduction in evidence of Norton Ghost images or any other electronic evidence. In most places in the US, I think, there wouldn't be any hard and fast rules; it would be up to the judge to decide whether the evidence was reliable enough. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBPy6JNJDnOfS48mrdEQLK3gCePqhRhiorx9XIiVVAY5EeczhReBwAn2Ll fGBCIWmS9abtcFPsYglvDJ0A =RO5b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Re: Reacting to a server compromise, (continued)
- Re: Re: Reacting to a server compromise morning_wood (Aug 03)
- Re: Re: Reacting to a server compromise manohar singh (Aug 03)
- Re: Reacting to a server compromise James A. Cox (Aug 03)
- Re: Re: Reacting to a server compromise morning_wood (Aug 03)
- RE: Re: Reacting to a server compromise Richard Stevens (Aug 04)
- Re: Re: Reacting to a server compromise Frank Bruzzaniti (Aug 04)
- RE: Re: Reacting to a server compromise Ron DuFresne (Aug 04)
- RE: Re: Reacting to a server compromise security snot (Aug 04)
- SV: Re: Reacting to a server compromise martin scherer (Aug 04)
- RE: Re: Reacting to a server compromise madsaxon (Aug 04)
- Re: Re: Reacting to a server compromise Darren Reed (Aug 04)
- RE: Reacting to a server compromise Brad Bemis (Aug 04)
- RE: Reacting to a server compromise Brad Bemis (Aug 04)
- RE: Reacting to a server compromise Jones, David H (Aug 04)
- Re: Reacting to a server compromise Jason Ellison (Aug 04)
- Re: Re: Reacting to a server compromise northern snowfall (Aug 04)
- RE: Reacting to a server compromise John . Airey (Aug 05)