Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: DDos counter measures


From: Charles Ballowe <hangman () steelballs org>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:10:27 -0500

Microsoft could solve lots of problems -- just have their name servers
return 216.250.140.112 for those names. ;)

(hint: point a browser at that IP, the reverse tables for it don't give
you a useful name...)

On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 08:12:37PM -0500, Gael Martinez wrote:
Try some other tests using no A record for windowsupdate.com in your local zone,
you will notice that the damages are even smaller doing that instead of localhost (127.0.0.1).

Gael


On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 08:04:54PM +0200, Laurent LEVIER wrote:
All,

Since our IntraNet solves all its DNS queries through internal caches 
(mandatory bottleneck), we created windowsupdate.com & 
windowsupdate.microsoft.com zones in this bottleneck DNS. These are 
resolving to 127.0.0.1 with DNS wildcards.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: