Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: [Secure Network Operations, Inc.] Full Disclosure != Exploit Release


From: backed.up.by.2048.bit.encryption () hushmail com
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:48:40 -0800


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:36:42 -0800 "Richard M. Smith" <rms () computerbytesman com> wrote:
Web bugs and cookies are more in the realm of privacy problems and
I
don't really see them as security issues.

Most of the security problems that I have worked on deal with ActiveX
controls that allow programs to be run and files to be written from
Web
pages and HTML email messages.


Well, where are they. All I can think of was a few proprietary controls in HP or some other vendors device that you 
originally discovered. Hardly a basis for your lofty claims that you have never had a problem with your advisories.

What was it HP and this Sony now?

Pretty much the same area that Georgi
works in.

Versus your dozen and your claim

I first wrote about the security problems with ActiveX controls
in the
April 1997 in an editorial for Visual Basic Programmer's Journal:

Everyone has been writing about it long before 1997, in fact all the classic original rogue controlswere prior to your 
article, again your information taken from other people's work. No wonder you have been sniffing around all week asking 
ludicrious questions "is there any exploit code for the worm" "what's the size of the morris worm" and on on and. DO 
you ever do any original work?



A few weeks ago, I found yet another ActiveX control that came
pre-installed on my new Sony laptop that allows programs to be executed
with arguments from a JavaScript program running in a Web page.
I sent
the software vendor a copy of my 6 year article because it still
makes
sense today.


Great. Now you can claim 13 exploits. Hardly.



PS.  What's with the personal attacks?

I am repulsed by your grandstanding. Your lofty claims which can very easily be shown to be nothing more than hot air, 
but more so your ringmaster attitude in calling Litchfield to center stage today.

I don't think you have the history or the credibility to parade around like you do. Re-read your "I've written at least 
a dozen proof-of-concept" it is dripping with conceit.

Remember this? Nothing has changed -


All of the hype appeared to come from a single source: Richard M. Smith, then-president of Phar Lap Software, who 
discovered an obscure bug in Netscape Navigator 3.0. Smith admitted he held no credentials in the subfields of computer 
security at the time. (He is now an Internet privacy expert. See below.) But a lack of credentials didn't stop him from 
chastizing legit experts who wanted to dispel the Good Times hoax virus alert (see related link). In a public 
CompuServe message addressed to NCSA expert Mich Kabay, Smith proclaimed:
"Talk about bad timing for these so-called "experts"! Last weekend I discovered an HTML attachment that will crash the 
Email reader in the Windows 95 version of Netscape Navigator. Its the good time virus for real...."
Genuine virus experts admonished Smith for breathing new life into the Good Times hoax. They also critiqued his claims 
about the bug's threat potential -- and they admonished Smith for using the term "virus" to describe either the bug or 
the security threat it posed.




-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of
backed.up.by.2048.bit.encryption () hushmail com
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:14 PM
To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [Secure Network Operations, Inc.]
Full
Disclosure != Exploit Release



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Probably because none of them were terrible important or interesting.
Didn't they all revolve around "web bugs" or "cookies" and
"supercookies" and the like? Essentially "stupid pet tricks"?

Hardly enough to give a script kiddy an erection?

Definitely not in the same league as Georgi Guninski's findings
and
absolutely not in David Litchfield's.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: Richard M. Smith

One problem with anyone making private exploits is that
they always seem to get leaked, no matter who it is.

I've written at least a dozen proof-of-concept examples for security
holes.  I've given these examples to vendors and shared them with
friends and other security researchers.  I'm not aware of any of
them
being made public.  In addition, I serious doubt that any of the
examples are of much use to anyone except to the vendor who messed
up in
the first place.

Vendors probably find the bulk of security holes and I seriously
doubt
many of these problems have proof-of-concept code published for
them.

OTOH we know that public proof-of-concept examples are going to
get into
the wrong hands.

Richard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Hush 2.2 (Java)
Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify

wnUEARECADUFAj44UZcuHGJhY2tlZC51cC5ieS4yMDQ4LmJpdC5lbmNyeXB0aW9uQGh1
c2htYWlsLmNvbQAKCRDEHQGvBp4eRHrmAJkB+xIhEUWPfNXVbYEqAQNBHgA1dQCfRKdh
tkxti9byVRWQemicBGq8X+c=
=VHyZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get
FREE encrypted email: https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2

Big $$$ to be made with the HushMail Affiliate Program:
https://www.hushmail.com/about.php?subloc=affiliate&l=427
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Hush 2.2 (Java)
Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify

wnUEARECADUFAj44dewuHGJhY2tlZC51cC5ieS4yMDQ4LmJpdC5lbmNyeXB0aW9uQGh1
c2htYWlsLmNvbQAKCRDEHQGvBp4eRGTyAKCsfq2Bj4HWCLwLEfrwMBbKOe29JQCggbK4
YeGd7Pa6QDJUrT8DPXpsaYc=
=IVao
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get
FREE encrypted email: https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2 

Big $$$ to be made with the HushMail Affiliate Program: 
https://www.hushmail.com/about.php?subloc=affiliate&l=427
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: