Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters)
From: northern snowfall <dbailey27 () ameritech net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:49:42 -0500
You are absolutely right! I will not argue this point at all. The only thing I will say is that product security is based on a process of evolution. My statement was intended to indicate that it is customerdemand that drives the speed of that evolution.
No. Customer demand should play the *least* part in security evolution. The *main* thing that security analysts and security developers should focus on are the capabilities of the opposition, whomever they may be. Your foe is not your customer, and if he is he will not lead you toward pleasant waters. Again, your thinking is dangerous. Don http://www.7f.no-ip.com/~north_ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters), (continued)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) northern snowfall (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) Blue Boar (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) northern snowfall (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) Ross Dmochowski (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) northern snowfall (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) northern snowfall (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) northern snowfall (Jul 16)
- RE: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) Jason Coombs (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) northern snowfall (Jul 16)
- Re: Microsoft wins Homeland Security Bid ( Reuters) morning_wood (Jul 16)