Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: RE: Linux (in)security
From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne () winternet com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:34:35 -0500 (CDT)
[SNIP]
Don't get me wrong, I agree with almost all of what you're saying about Microsoft's poor track record. However, in the interest of fairness I'd like to add that I've had to back out of a fair number of patches to various Unices and Linux systems because the patch broke something else, usually in a fairly complex enterprise environment.
There's a vast difference in having to backout patches in complex production env;s and having a poor patch affect all or most every end desktop/home users system too though. Thanks, Ron DuFresne ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart ***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!*** OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Linux Exec Shield (was: Linux (in)security), (continued)
- Linux Exec Shield (was: Linux (in)security) Chris Ruvolo (Oct 23)
- Re: Linux Exec Shield (was: Linux (in)security) Peter Busser (Oct 23)
- Re: Linux Exec Shield (was: Linux (in)security) Arjan van de Ven (Oct 23)
- Re: Linux Exec Shield (was: Linux (in)security) Chris Ruvolo (Oct 24)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security I.R. van Dongen (Oct 22)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Robert Brockway (Oct 22)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security madsaxon (Oct 23)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Ron DuFresne (Oct 23)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Paul Schmehl (Oct 23)