Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security
From: KF <dotslash () snosoft com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 00:23:11 -0400
can you still determine that it has been owned when a windows root kit has been installed on it? this would be the win32 equivilant of a malicious LKM.Sven Hoexter wrote:On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 06:09:12AM -0700, dwr3ck () hushmail com wrote:I can determine when a Windows box has been owned fairly easily.Can you? Really? Hm maybe I should use windows.
www.rootkit.com I think has some LKM like functionality. -KF _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security, (continued)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security VeNoMouS (Oct 29)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 29)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Ben Laurie (Oct 30)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Bill Royds (Oct 29)
- RE: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security dhtml (Oct 24)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Sebastian Niehaus (Oct 24)
- RE: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security dwr3ck (Oct 24)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 24)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Sven Hoexter (Oct 24)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Shawn McMahon (Oct 24)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security KF (Oct 24)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Sebastian Niehaus (Oct 24)
- RE: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Dennis Schön (Oct 24)