Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: NINCOMPOOPERY OF MICROSOFT


From: Stormwalker <bruen () coldrain net>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:25:13 -0400 (EDT)



IANAL, but I know that the legal system is divided into a criminal
piece and a civil piece. Criminals are those who break criminal law. 
Civil proceedings tend to be about business disputes, lawsuits, divorces, 
etc, where the court acts like a third party mediator.

                      cheers, bob

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Georgi Guninski wrote:

This user Bullmur should be carefull with the word "criminal".

Question to the lawyers on the list: It is my understanding that
"criminal" is someone who breaks the law. microsoft seem to have been
found guilty by a court in the antitrust trial, so they seem to have
broken the law.

Are microsoft criminals from legal point of view?

Or does justice work this way: if you deface a website, you are a
criminal, but if you screw most of the internet you are a hero?

georgi



On Wed,  1 Oct 2003 07:54:12 -0700
<dhtml () hush com> wrote:

"Hackers are criminals" Most, he notes, release their malicious code
after patches for Microsoft software have been released, meaning that
they are simply reverse engineering to exploit security weaknesses or
holes in software. - Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer 

'ninkum`poop [n]  a stupid foolish person See Also: simple, simpleton



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: