Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Allchin bug p-o-c.
From: Andrew.Berges () everestre com
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 13:28:56 -0400
So how large of an impact are we looking at here for the average networked environment? I don't see this service running on any of our servers here, although the exe is most definitely there ... is this a subprocess that gets spawned as necessary to allow applications to communicate with the OS? Pardon my ignorance. Regards, Andrew Berges - Associate Manager, Systems Everest Global Services 908.604.3020 andrew.berges () everestre com -----Original Message----- From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:27 PM To: Andrew.Berges () everestre com Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Allchin bug p-o-c. On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 11:02:13 EDT, Andrew.Berges () everestre com said:
Hi, I'm rather new to this list, and I think I may have missed some of the background on this - could someone bring me up to speed as to what is happening here?
Allchin said under oath that Microsoft didn't want to release the APIs, because some of them were so crufty that to release them would jeopardize national security. Ever since then, people have been looking for what API he was talking about. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Allchin bug p-o-c. Dave Korn (Oct 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Allchin bug p-o-c. Andrew . Berges (Oct 07)
- Re: Allchin bug p-o-c. Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 09)
- RE: Allchin bug p-o-c. Andrew . Berges (Oct 07)
- Re: Allchin bug p-o-c. Dave Korn (Oct 08)