Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: AW: no more public exploits


From: tcleary2 () csc com au
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:13:04 +0800

Cael Abal said:

Realistically,the lack of a widespread published exploit means an 
attack on any given machine is less likely.  An admin who chooses 
to ignore these probabilities isn't looking at their job with the right 
perspective.

You missed the "IMHO".

In the Military your generalisation is probably not a self evident truth.

To quote another posters sig. "Knowing what you don't know is more 
important
than knowing what you know." and I would add that that's because what you
do know you can try to deal with.

Enough of the philosophy class.

Regards,

tom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Cleary - Security Architect

"In IT, acceptable solutions depend upon humans - Computers don't 
negotiate."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in 
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to 
bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit 
written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of 
e-mail for such purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: