Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Administrivia: Meta Discussions (about the list itself)
From: Len Rose <len () netsys com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 14:53:16 -0400 (EDT)
We'd like to ask everyone to please reconsider discussing these issues on the list itself. By flooding the list with endless arguments we're actually causing more harm than good. Everyone feels strongly about issues that concern them directly, but please try and restrain this type of discussion to the absolute minimum if at all. We would like to thank everyone for their participation and patience when things get noisy. We especially want to thank the vendors and researchers who contribute to Full Disclosure. They make the concept of full disclosure work. The results are obvious as we look at our systems and network environments today. We hope to continue working on improving latency and for those people who insist on posting but never subscribe, the delays your posts experience are due to human time constraints as we often are busy and overlook the moderation queue. As always send your complaints and comments to us, we do read them though we don't always answer. Thanks! John and Len PS ( Len: I think that Morning Wood should get the award for cleaning his act up on Full Disclosure, so a special mention is deserved in my personal opinion. ) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Administrivia: Meta Discussions (about the list itself) Len Rose (Apr 05)