Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Cisco LEAP exploit tool...
From: <id3nt () hush com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:41:27 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Dave and what was it ... jeff, Curt and exhibar, your in here too, and I'll throw Fitzgerled on just for fun.... Neither one of you know what the fuck your talking about. I suggest you http://www.graphicupstart.com/clients/misc/stfu.jpg Before you go posting your opinons, might I suggest you get the facts in line with those opinons. Have you ever properly setup a 2.4 ghz wireless link longer than 7 miles? If not, don't post what some1 eles states as it may not be true. I have links in excess of 8 miles w/o violating the FCC rules. What's the card, 30mw or 100mw, what's the amp 250mw or 500mw. How many MWs in a watt? If dBm = (10Log10(milliWatts))then 1 mW = 0 dBm and thus Watts = 10((dBm - - 30)/10) milliWatts = 10(dBm/10) Hence we can then calculate that 100mW = 20 dBm or .1 watts (100mW) This gives me plenty of room to play. Had you said something about the fresnal zone then I may have posted something like this: ahh nevermind, it's clear neither of you have the desire to learn .... Curt, Exhibar and Fitz.... It's fine to be noobs. We were all noobs at one point. Most of us watched, listened and learned. Might I suggest you sit back and listen and learn. Basically, http://www.graphicupstart.com/clients/misc/stfu.jpg id3nt, hobbits friend... 7 miles away is stretching it a bit far considering that all 802.11g wireless transmissions range between 2.4 - 2.4835 Ghz 802.11a/h/j range between 5.47 - 5.725 Ghz not only are the frequencies prone to scatter...the radio waves bounce off everything. All wireless routers are limited by FCC regulations to a maximum of 1 watt. http://www.odessaoffice.com/wireless/fcc_ism.html (1) For frequency hopping systems in the 2400-2483.5 MHz band employing at least 75 hopping channels, all frequency hopping systems in the 5725- 5850 MHz band, and all direct sequence systems: 1 watt. For all other frequency hopping systems in the 2400-2483.5 MHz band: 0.125 watts. To get a 2.4 Ghz signal to travel 7 miles you would have to install an amplifier to boost the output to somewhere between 5 to 10 watts a 5 Ghz signal would require even more at which point you're in violation of FCC rules and Uncle Sam might come looking for ya. Just an FYI. On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:42:43 -0700 Dave Horsfall <dave () horsfall org> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Jeff Schreiner wrote:To get a 2.4 Ghz signal to travel 7 miles you would have to installanamplifier to boost the output to somewhere between 5 to 10 wattsa 5 Ghzsignal would require even more at which point you're in violationof FCCrules and Uncle Sam might come looking for ya.Or use a beam antenna. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Version: Hush 2.3 wkYEARECAAYFAkB99+IACgkQIgPmhDwqbfT4HgCeM37pvtex/RWiRTDTRa5jQEBnsrYA n0WouI2XuDj8uuGHZA8f53Rar6nj =A39l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get FREE encrypted email: https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2 Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger https://www.hushmail.com/services.php?subloc=messenger&l=434 Promote security and make money with the Hushmail Affiliate Program: https://www.hushmail.com/about.php?subloc=affiliate&l=427 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Office XP Update: March 23, 2004, (continued)
- Office XP Update: March 23, 2004 insecure (Apr 16)
- Re: Office XP Update: March 23, 2004 Frank Knobbe (Apr 16)
- Re: [inbox] RE: Cisco LEAP exploit tool... marc (Apr 16)
- RE: Cisco LEAP exploit tool... Ron DuFresne (Apr 16)
- RE: Cisco LEAP exploit tool... Jason Slagle (Apr 15)
- Re: Cisco LEAP exploit tool... Ken Anderson (Pacific Internet) (Apr 16)
- Re: Cisco LEAP exploit tool... KF (lists) (Apr 14)
- Re: Cisco LEAP exploit tool... Byron Copeland (Apr 14)
- Re: Cisco LEAP exploit tool... Amaury Jacquot (Apr 14)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Cisco LEAP exploit tool... Curt Purdy (Apr 15)
- RE: Cisco LEAP clueless exploit tool... morning_wood (Apr 14)
- RE: [inbox] RE: Cisco LEAP exploit tool... Curt Purdy (Apr 15)
- RE: [inbox] RE: Cisco LEAP exploit tool... Bart . Lansing (Apr 16)