Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: (no subject)
From: Maarten <fulldisc () ultratux org>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 03:35:31 +0200
On Saturday 14 August 2004 02:52, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 21:17:44 +0200, Maarten said:The only thing Todd (and I) are trying to say is that it is possible to rename after the fact. I don't #!%$&* care how many old Cobol programs need adapting for that to "get" possible, but the fact remains that it IS.The question is *in fact* what ROI the companies get for modifying all that old Cobol. "Possible" and "worth doing" are two different things...
Oh definitely. I do not contest that. But these posts saying "not possible" from a technical / logistical standpoint started to irritate me... But sure, until there is an economic reason for change, there won't be.
How about mergers, or international intelligence-exchange between law enforcement agencies. Do you think that they let anyone stop them by complaining that database format X isn't readily compatible with format Y ? No. They fix it, they make it work together no matter what.Actually, that isn't always the case. http://www.publicintegrity.org/report.aspx?aid=332&sid=100 Yes, a database so borked that copying it could break it.
Hahaha. Great link, thanks... Although this may happen, it sounds to me like a political issue rather than a technical one. When you can retrieve data you can copy it (by however [inefficient] means is irrelevant now).
Hell, we're talking about an industry which as a whole *continues* to keep spewing out 'We removed a virus/worm' warnings to known not-at-fault addresses - presumably the (probably very low) cost of ceasing to do so is counterbalanced by the advertising benefit of the spam. If they won't do *THAT* little thing that's *obviously* in the public interest, why should they change the way they name stuff, at probably higher cost, and less obvious benefit?
Hear hear...! Good point. Maarten -- Yes of course I'm sure it's the red cable. I guarante[^%!/+)F#0c|'NO CARRIER _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: (no subject), (continued)
- Re: (no subject) Todd Burroughs (Aug 13)
- Re: (no subject) Harlan Carvey (Aug 13)
- Re: (no subject) Barry Fitzgerald (Aug 13)
- Re: (no subject) Harlan Carvey (Aug 13)
- Re: (no subject) Barry Fitzgerald (Aug 13)
- Re: (no subject) Frank Knobbe (Aug 13)
- Re: (no subject) (try using a friggin subject line...) KF_lists (Aug 13)
- Re: (no subject) Nick FitzGerald (Aug 13)
- Re: (no subject) Maarten (Aug 13)
- Re: (no subject) Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 13)
- Re: (no subject) Maarten (Aug 13)
- Re: (no subject) Nick FitzGerald (Aug 14)
- Re: (no subject) Al Reust (Aug 15)
- Re: (no subject) Maarten (Aug 15)
- Re: (no subject) Michel Messerschmidt (Aug 16)
- Re: (no subject) Todd Burroughs (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Nick FitzGerald (Aug 10)
- RE: AV Naming Convention Todd Towles (Aug 10)
- RE: AV Naming Convention Nick FitzGerald (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 10)
- Re: (no subject) Frank Knobbe (Aug 10)