Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: The 'good worm' from HP
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 17:45:04 +1200
Todd Towles wrote:
Yeah I remember first hearing about that in the Patch Management circles. Does sounds like a good idea. Anyone that has been over patch managemtn can tell you that patches break stuff. Now software will automatically break software with software patches. =) Interesting.
And, aside from the "Are 'Good' Viruses Still a Bad Idea?" issues, some historical precedent suggests that this a hard set of problems to fix. In the earliest (?) academic/commercial research into worm-like behaviour, where the intention was purely to better utilize the resouirces of the individual machines in a network, to perform housekeeping tasks on said machines out of hours and so on, things went awry and the project was abandoned. IIRC, that work was by Shoch & Hupp at XEROX PARC in the early 80's and is widely cited in some circles... -- Nick FitzGerald Computer Virus Consulting Ltd. Ph/FAX: +64 3 3529854 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP, (continued)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Maarten (Aug 20)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Nick FitzGerald (Aug 20)
- RE: The 'good worm' from HP fulldisclosure (Aug 21)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP michael williamson (Aug 21)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Maarten (Aug 21)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP michael williamson (Aug 21)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Bart . Lansing (Aug 23)
- RE: The 'good worm' from HP Nick FitzGerald (Aug 20)
- RE: The 'good worm' from HP joe (Aug 22)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP The Central Scroutinizer (Aug 22)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP stephane nasdrovisky (Aug 23)
- Re: The 'good worm' from HP Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 23)
- RE: !SPAM! RE: The 'good worm' from HP Yaakov Yehudi (Aug 24)