RE: W2K source "leaked"?

["Nick Jacobsen" <nick () ethicsdesign com>]

http://smokeherb.com/windows/
Both NT4 and 2000.
 
As a side note, there is actually very little content in these files...
this is a very much "partial" leak...

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Byron Copeland 
        Sent: Thu 2/12/2004 5:16 PM 
        To: Gregory A. Gilliss 
        Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com 
        Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] W2K source "leaked"?
        
        

        As an avid FULL DISCLOSURE reader, where is this "some of"
source code?
        
        On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 18:55, Gregory A. Gilliss wrote:
        > Does this count as confirmation?
        >
        > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/993933.stm
        >
        > G
        >
        > On or about 2004.02.12 23:48:52 +0000, Gadi Evron
(ge () egotistical reprehensible net) said:
        >
        > > A couple of days ago a friend of mine drew my attention to
the source
        > > making rounds on the encrypted p2p networks, I was hoping it
would take
        > > a bit longer for it to be "out", but that was just
day-dreaming.
        > >
        > > Thor Larholm just gave me this URL, as you can notice, the
server is busy:
        > > http://www.neowin.net/comments.php?id=17509
        > >
        > <<SNIP>>
        
        _______________________________________________
        Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
        Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

<<winmail.dat>>