Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions
From: Frank Knobbe <frank () knobbe us>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:51:36 -0500
On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 10:35, Frank Knobbe wrote:
I believe the issue was that there is no such thing as "user:pwd@" for http: or any other URI's with the exception of FTP:
... and Telnet. Forgot about that. My bad.... should have read RFC 1738 with more coffee... Frank
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions, (continued)
- Re: Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions Jordan Cole (stilist) (Jul 09)
- Re: Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions Nick FitzGerald (Jul 10)
- Re: Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions bipin gautam (Jul 10)
- Security contact at Lexmark? Anyone? Peter Kruse (Jul 10)
- Re: Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions Florian Weimer (Jul 10)
- Re: Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions Jordan Cole (stilist) (Jul 10)
- Re: Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions Florian Weimer (Jul 10)
- Re: Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions Nick FitzGerald (Jul 10)
- Re: Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions Eric Paynter (Jul 10)
- Re: Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions Frank Knobbe (Jul 11)
- Re: Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions Frank Knobbe (Jul 11)
- Re: Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions Nick FitzGerald (Jul 10)
- Re: Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions Nick FitzGerald (Jul 11)
- Re: Microsoft Faces Angry IE Users' Questions Jordan Cole (stilist) (Jul 09)