Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP
From: Peter Ferrie <pferrie () symantec com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:29:49 -0700
Anyone have any clues as to why my machine seems vunerable to it?
Yes. Look in the file and you'll see that it is a ~1Mb wide 24-bit colour bitmap. That's going to take a lot of memory when there are several of them (as in that example). 8^) p. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP, (continued)
- RE: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Sapheriel (Jul 12)
- RE: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP jhaunsystem (Jul 12)
- RE: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Eric Paynter (Jul 13)
- AW: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Webmaster (Jul 12)
- Re: AW: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Lee Packham (Jul 12)
- Re: AW: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP morning_wood (Jul 12)
- Re: AW: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Lee Packham (Jul 12)
- Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP & Thunderbird 0.72 & Outlook Express (latest Version) thE_iNviNciblE (Jul 12)
- Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Thomas Kaschwig (Jul 12)
- Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Bernardo Santos Wernesback (Jul 12)
- RE: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Sapheriel (Jul 12)
- Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Peter Ferrie (Jul 12)
- Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Jorge A. Orchilles (Jul 12)