Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Akamai
From: "james edwards" <hackerwacker () cybermesa com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:20:53 -0600
"Young called it a "large scale, international attack on Internet infrastructure." However, there was no evidence that non-Akamai infrastructure was affected." http://apnews.excite.com/article/20040615/D837KIU00.html Regards, Brent
With an attack of this indicated size, there are always choke points just prior to the DoS traffic hitting the intended hosts. These choke points tend to be NAP's or IX'es. The real harm gets done at these points, where the DoS converges. So far no one has spoken up on NANOG with issues at NAP's or IX'es. With the last big DDoS of the DNS root's the roots never when down; it was the access points just prior to the root that took the beating. I had no problems with any east or west coast NAP's or IX'es this morning nor were any problems reported on NANOG. james _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Akamai Niek Baakman (Jun 15)
- Re: Akamai Niek Baakman (Jun 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Akamai Chris Carlson (Jun 15)
- Re: Akamai james edwards (Jun 15)
- RE: Akamai Brent Colflesh (Jun 15)
- Re: Akamai james edwards (Jun 15)
- Re: Akamai Darren Reed (Jun 15)
- Re: Akamai Paul Schmehl (Jun 16)
- Re: Akamai Ron DuFresne (Jun 16)
- Re: Akamai Peter van den Heuvel (Jun 16)
- Re: Akamai Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 16)
- Re: Akamai Peter van den Heuvel (Jun 16)
- Re: Akamai gabriel rosenkoetter (Jun 16)
- Re: Akamai james edwards (Jun 15)
- Re: Akamai Darren Reed (Jun 17)
- Re: Akamai scosol () scosol org (Jun 15)
- Re: Akamai james edwards (Jun 15)