Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: NOT GOOD: Outlook Express 6 + Internet Explorer 6
From: madsaxon <madsaxon () direcway com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:44:41 -0600
At 02:53 PM 3/31/2004 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:06:29 +0300, Georgi Guninski said: > is this tru$tworthy computing part 2 or are we at part 1 still? It's more like the 386th book in a Harlequin Romance series - Same Stuff, Different Day.
Since we've haven't actually seen anything trustworthy come out of Redmond, I thought we must still be in the preamble stage:We the lusers of Microsoft, in order to turn a more perfect profit, establish a smokescreen, insure fiscal liquidity, provide for the highest dividend, promote media goodwill, and secure the blessings of monopoly to ourselves and our stockholders, do ordain and establish this Trustworthy Computing Initiative. Eventually.
m5x _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- NOT GOOD: Outlook Express 6 + Internet Explorer 6 http-equiv () excite com (Mar 31)
- Re: NOT GOOD: Outlook Express 6 + Internet Explorer 6 Georgi Guninski (Mar 31)
- Re: NOT GOOD: Outlook Express 6 + Internet Explorer 6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 31)
- Re: NOT GOOD: Outlook Express 6 + Internet Explorer 6 madsaxon (Mar 31)
- Re: NOT GOOD: Outlook Express 6 + Internet Explorer 6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 31)
- SEARCH web attack i.t Consulting (Mar 31)
- Re: SEARCH web attack Jeff Workman (Mar 31)
- Re: NOT GOOD: Outlook Express 6 + Internet Explorer 6 Georgi Guninski (Mar 31)