Re: My Signature

["Keith A. Pachulski" <keithp () corp ptd net>]

and this has what to do with anything of importance or to the relevance
of this mailing list?

On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 09:56, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> some of the people told me that my signature isn't correct.
> for some people here it looks like this or simelarly:
>
> Nico Golde | nico () ngolde de | 310777820@ICQ | nion@gmx.=
> net
> http://www.ngolde.de | GnuPG Key: http://www.ngolde.de/gpg/nico_golde.=
> gpg
> Fingerprint | FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7=
> CFF=20
> vim -c ":%s/^/WhfgTNabgureRIvzSUnpxreT-Tavba/|:%s/[R-T]/ /Ig|:normal
> ggVG=
> g?"
>
> i dont know why it is so, because for me and some others it looks like
> this:
>
> Nico Golde                | nico () ngolde de      | 310777820@ICQ | nion () gmx net
> http://www.ngolde.de      | GnuPG Key: http://www.ngolde.de/gpg/nico_golde.gpg
> Fingerprint               | FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69  C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF
> vim -c   ":%s/^/WhfgTNabgureRIvzSUnpxreT-Tavba/|:%s/[R-T]/ /Ig|:normal ggVGg?"
>
> my mailer is mutt(linux) and i have really no idea why some people here say it is so.
> in the attachment is my signature file, if someone will take a look.
> but i think it only depends on the mailer you use or the formation.
> does someone have an idea?
> regards nico
-- 
|Keith A. Pachulski | PenTeleData LP1 Information Security and Privacy|
|Phone: (800) 281.3564 x2454 | Pager: 6103497095 () vtext com|
|PGP: 6B56 C8DC 6201 6D1A BFF5  5799 E193 ABAA 9549 74D0|

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part